Bill Warner Moment: The Self-Taught Revolution against Sharia

Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel.

Please donate through our Pay Pal account or GoFundMe campaign to help The Glazov Gang keep going. Thank you!

This special edition of the Glazov Gang presents the Bill Warner Moment with Dr. Bill Warner, the president of politicalislam.com.

Dr. Warner discusses The Self-Taught Revolution against Sharia, unveiling how intellectual guerilla fighters are breaking through the elite’s Party Line on Islam — and making the truth available for the common man.

Don’t miss it!

And make sure to watch Anne Marie Waters discuss The Islamic Darkness Descends on Europe:

Subscribe to our YouTube Channel and to Jamie Glazov Productions. Also LIKE us on Facebook and LIKE Jamie’s FB Fan Page.

8 thoughts on “Bill Warner Moment: The Self-Taught Revolution against Sharia”

  1. Muslims in the West are not asking for Sharia to be the law of the land. The Law of the land is the only law applicable and executable in affairs of the individuals.

    All they are seeking is to let Sharia be available as an alternative to resolve their spousal and contractual disputes between two individuals. That is their prerogative. Indeed, every human, no matter who it is, goes first to their family members and friends for seeking solutions to their problem some will go to their clergy (all religions) and some will appoint a mediator.

    When Muslims go to their clergy, he or she will look up similar situations in the past and guide the couple or business partners to find a solution, since the immigrant Muslims are familiar with the Sharia laws, they may accept it, and if they do, that is good for them.

    The problem is that of trust – when the parties agree to the terms per their Imam/clergy, and don’t abide by it, there is no way the aggrieved party can seek damages for the violations. This is what Muslims are asking, to make that binding.

    Indeed, it would be binding if they go to the judge and say, we have agreed to these terms and conditions per our religious conviction, and seek the judge to sign the order and the court order becomes executable. The judge looks to it as mediator resolved decision and signs it and it will become executable. The right wing Americans are downright stupid and making a bid deal about this, as if Sharia will become the law of the land.

    What Muslims have is Personal Sharia, that is a private relationship between the individual and God. How they pray, worship, fast, pay zakat, how they bury their individuals, marry per the requirement as a religious rite. All of that is a private matter and does not need any regulation or execution.
    IA
    http://www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk

    1. Muslims in the West are not asking for Sharia to be the law of the land. The Law of the land is the only law applicable and executable in affairs of the individuals.

      BC, in his response to you, claimed your arguments were specious. Well that’s true, and I commend BC for his restraint, but I will go further: you are a damn liar. You may be correct in terms of what academics at the London School say in public, but it is simply not what all-too-many Moslems on the street believe.

      Moreover, the miserable history of Islam belies your eyewash: shariah has always been understood to suppress the infidel where Islam rules (e.g. the jizya). It also has been understood, per the sacred texts of Islam, to impose draconian restrictions not only on kuffars, but also on believers in the savage ideology known as Islam (e.g. death to apostates).

      I think you know better than your soothing words indicate. I think your anodyne words are intended to deceive. And, oh yes, that would be very unchanged in line with another tenant of Islam: taqiyya.

    2. If anyone wants to have access to Sharia law and its implementation, on any level, they need to emigrate to a nation that practices it.

      So, off you trot, to Saudi Arabia then.

      If anyone wants the freedoms, luxuries, rights, choices and opportunities of a Western democracy – then move there.

      But toe the line wherever you go.

      Sharia is brutal for women. And it has no place in any western democratic country.

    3. “All they are seeking is to let Sharia be available as an alternative to resolve their spousal and contractual disputes between two individuals. ”

      You do not have to “ask” for that – you can just do it. Just like any club or society in any Western country you can have your own rules and enforce them (between consenting adults). No need to involve the state or any non-muslim.

      No the very fact that you “ask” for this betrays that something more is involved.

      What you are in fact asking for seems to be that the state authorities recognise these decisions in some way. Well actually even that does not have to be asked for – the rules of your local golf club will be recognised if an argument within the club boils up into a proper legal dispute.

      However – here is the rub – they will only be recognised if they are compatible with applicable civil law.

      So – from the simple fact that you feel the need to ask I would conclude:

      1. That you are actually asking for the state to recognise the decisions of these bodies – and
      2. That this recognition should be extended to cases where the Sharia court came to a conclusion that is in contradiction to local civil laws.

      That is what you are REALLY asking for – and it is interesting that you don’t admit it.

  2. As you are aware the sharia councils are all male. I have never heard of one where women sit as arbitrators. So how do women get a fair hearing and representation as they would be entitled to in a Western legal system. If you choose to live in a Western country you must submit tot he laws of that country.
    Why do you think Muslims carry signs and shout slogans saying ‘Democracy is hypocrisy/cancer, Sharia is the answer’.
    Sharia will rule the world, etc. They are rejecting the country’s legal system and demanding their own system to replace it. This in fact shows they are fanatics and stupid ones at that , as Western countries will never give up their long fought for freedoms and subject themselves to a mediaeval system of justice.
    Your arguments are specious

  3. …Western countries will never give up their long fought for freedoms and subject themselves to a mediaeval system of justice.
    Dunno about that. France is already outbred by their muslims. Germany still suppresses honest conversation about the most vile crimes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *