Jamie Glazov Moment: Police “May Never Know” Motive of London ISIS Terrorist

Spread the news

Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel.

Please donate through our Pay Pal account or GoFundMe campaign to help The Glazov Gang keep going. Thank you!

In this new Jamie Glazov Moment, Jamie focuses on Police “May Never Know” Motive of London ISIS Terrorist, reflecting on the mystery wrapped inside an enigma that ensues unabated.

Don’t miss it!

And make sure to watch Jamie give key tips on How Not to Blame Islam for the Jihad in London, where he offers a simple and easy-to-understand how-to video for leftists on how and why to maintain Jihad-Denial:

Subscribe to our YouTube Channel and to Jamie Glazov Productions. Also LIKE us on Facebook and LIKE Jamie’s FB Fan Page.

5 thoughts on “Jamie Glazov Moment: Police “May Never Know” Motive of London ISIS Terrorist”

  1. I wonder whites or non Muslims were not terrorists when mercilessly killed humans in millions indiscriminately like in World Wars I & II, killings by Stalin, Holocaust, Killings by Nazis of Poles, Russians, and other Europeans, killings of Germans, decade long carpet bombings day and night Of Vietnam, Korean wars, killing in Myanmar of Muslims, killings in Cambodia by Pol Pot, killings in Ukraine, Bombings of Hiroshima & Nagasaki, genocide and ethnic cleansing in Balkans, mass killings in Muslim lands of innocent civilians both by terrorists and by opposing forces in the name of war against terrorism, fighting among warring factions for control with proxy wars where too Muslim lands and people are worst victims. No Muslim country in the world is supporting or carrying out terrorism and instead all are themselves worst victims and actively at war against terrorism and militancy.

    I failed to understand why term has been coined of Muslim terrorism, when none but only Muslim lands and its people are worst victims with even their own places of worships, religious processions, holy shrines etc are not secure and routinely come under deadly attacks causing carnage of innocent people while no such comparable threats or attacks on any non-Muslim. Lands except seldom sporadic incidents of one or two killings. Further incidents of killings and shoot outs by non Muslims are suppressed while a single isolated incident by a Muslim is much propagated out of proportions and given various colours.

    In the media discussion of Masood’s ‘radicalisation’, old acquaintances of his have said it was the racism he experienced in rural Kent that made him snap. Others, citing his past instances of drug-fuelled anti-social behaviour, suggest he was not quite responsible for his violent behaviour. Some of these claims contain a hint that he was a put-upon, vulnerable individual and perhaps even suffered from some kind of mental illness. Reports claim that when he left prison – following a conviction for violent assault – he was a ‘changed man’. In prison he converted to Islam and some think it was this process of radicalisation that led him to jihadist violence.

    Islam didn’t bring violence to him. He brought violence to Islam. Accept the facts. He got a Muslim name.. That’s enough for Islamophobic Muslim haters sick people to bash 1.8 billion Muslims. Even they are not ashamed to hide American killing 47 and 233 civilian in Syrian and Iraq on 23 and 26 of this month. His lifestyle & behaviour is not one fitting of a Muslim or any decent human being. He was a British Christian terrorist that u guys are ashamed of therefore thinking the right place to dump pig blame is to associate him with Islam….Shame on u.

    Lets not also Forget, He was a Christian for 45 years Adrian Russell.. he become violent and stabbed people while he was a Christian… I guess maybe that a very Christian upbringing isn’t it??

    This man has a string of crimes and violence before using any religion has an excuse. I would just call him a crazed Brit. where did the guy in London state anywhere that he was doing it in the name of Islam … nowhere. The sad thing is more people have died at the hands of kids going into schools and shooting their class mates. Over the last decade than any attack blamed on religious or political purposes. More unharmed men have died at the end of a police officers gun. But they blame Islam.

    1. You sound like a fool…………muslims have been killing and raping for 1400 years now ……..you have no examples (none) of any christians killing others in the name of Christ.


  2. Iftikhar Ahmad,
    You make the claim that whites and non-Muslims and all those vile actions are not considered terrorists or acts of terror. What utter nonsense. Much, of what you have lumped together, have been considered acts of terrorism although genocide, mass murder, and cultural purity, are more accurate descriptions.

    A better question is why do you not consider Islamic terrorist acts as directly, religiously ordained?

    The dictionary defines a terrorist as a radical who employs terror as a political weapon; who usually organizes with other terrorists in small cells; and who often uses religion as a cover for their terrorist activities. Those named as Islamic terrorists have been witnessed or have left behind evidence that what they did was for Allah and the Prophet’s teachings.

    Your claim that “No Muslim country in the world is supporting or carrying out terrorism” would be comical if it wasn’t such a dangerous fallacy.

    Most often, we do not refer to these barbaric attacks as Muslim terrorism but as Islamic terrorism. The attacks are being committed by rabid believers who are guided by numerous graphic passages, spread throughout the Quran, that do call for these actions.

    The atrocities committed by Muslims against other Muslims and their holy sites are the result of a pathological belief that any disagreement in religious interpretation or practice is blasphemy, an affront to Allah and “our” understanding of Allah’s will and which must be destroyed. It is a total lack of tolerance for any difference of opinion or understanding that can only be cleansed through willing submission or eradication.

    “…incidents of killings and shoot outs by non Muslims are suppressed while a single isolated incident by a Muslim is much propagated out of proportion…” That is simply not true. The complete opposite is most often the case.

    Khalid Masood’s birth name was Adrian Russell Ajao. By leaving off his surname, Ajao, were you intimating that he was actually English or white? At different times, he was also known as Adrian Elms and Khalid Chowdhury. He probably changed that last one after Anjem was jailed. Let us also not forget that ISIS claimed he was one of their “soldiers”.

  3. The willful blindness to Islamic terror would be unbelievable if we weren’t witnessing the reality of it. As for Iftikhar Ahmad’s comment, it’s the same victim mentality Muslims use as one of the excuses for their 1400 years of pillage, rape, enslavement, and murder that we hear over and over, he has nothing new to add.

  4. The London Metropolitan Police are supposed to be the most highly trained police force in the world. I’m surprised they didn’t arrest Tommy Robinson for hurting the feelings of this murdering death cultist. You don’t suspect that this police force has been “got at” by our PC (and muslim) politicians? Law and order in the UK doesn’t count when it comes to pandering to the invading plunderers who come from islamic countries. There will come a tipping point when the indigenous British citizen becomes so pissed off with having his generosity abused that there will be blood on the streets. Enoch Powell was right all along.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *